Pay
Higher than most similar jobs
$150K–$450K against $118K–$193K, the middle half of what similar US postings state.
From 3,721 postings in the last year. Stated ranges, not salaries paid.
Sunnyvale, CA
Open 4 months, first seen by us 149 days agoSalary 150,000 – 450,000 USD per year Compensation
Compensation $150,000 – $450,000/year + discretionary performance bonus + benefits The posted salary range represents the company’s good faith estimate of the base compensation for this position upon hire. The actual base compensation offered may vary within this range depending on individual qualifications, including but not limited to relevant skills, experience, education, certifications, and specific business needs. In addition to base salary, total compensation includes an annual discretionary performance bonus and comprehensive benefits.Read the full posting
Work setup in the employer’s posting: onsiteFrom the employer’s posting
Employment type Full-time
Employment type in the employer’s posting: Full-timeFrom the employer’s posting
The Agents team trains advanced agentic language models that use reasoning and tool use to complete real tasks on a computer.
You'll own the agentic data pipeline end-to-end — sourcing and generating high-quality trajectories, tool-use data, and RL environments — and the evaluation suite that tells us, rigorously and reproducibly, what our agents can actually do.
Design and run evals of multi-step reasoning, tool use, and computer use
Build and harden evaluation harnesses that run benchmarks reliably at scale
Diagnose anomalous eval results mid-training-run and explain the cause
Source, generate, and curate agentic training data and task datasets
Design and scale RL environments and reward signals
The Agents team trains advanced agentic language models that use reasoning and tool use to complete real tasks on a computer. This is a specialist role at the center of the loop that drives those models: the data we train on and the benchmarks we measure against.
You'll own the agentic data pipeline end-to-end — sourcing and generating high-quality trajectories, tool-use data, and RL environments — and the evaluation suite that tells us, rigorously and reproducibly, what our agents can actually do. These two halves are inseparable: benchmarks expose where models fail, and targeted data closes the gap. The agents are only as good as the data they learn from and the evals that keep us honest, and this role owns both.
Design and run evaluations of agentic capabilities — multi-step reasoning, tool use, long-horizon planning, computer use, and safety properties
Build and harden evaluation harnesses so benchmarks run reliably at scale against training checkpoints
Diagnose anomalous eval results mid-training-run — determine whether the cause is the model, the data, the harness, or the infrastructure
Source, generate, and curate high-quality agentic training data: trajectories, tool-use traces, and task datasets for new capabilities.
Design and scale RL environments and reward signals, and measure their impact on model performance.
2+ years of experience with a clear emphasis on evaluations and/or training-data curation for ML systems (related areas: LLM training/fine-tuning, RL, or distributed ML systems).
Strong Python and PyTorch development experience.
Demonstrated experience designing and deep-diving into evaluations, or curating and generating training datasets — ideally both.
Hands-on experience using LLM agents in your personal or professional work.
Experience with reinforcement learning, reward design, or RL environment construction for LLMs.
Experience with large-scale dataset sourcing, curation, and processing, including working with external vendors or domain experts.
Strong knowledge of the literature on agent evaluation, RL, LLM reasoning, and tool use.
Experience building or operating data pipelines and evaluation infrastructure reliable at scale (e.g., PyTorch, Ray).
Academic qualifications - BS, MS, or PhD (or equivalent experience) in Computer Science, Machine Learning, or a related field. Minimum qualifications
The Institute of Foundation Models (IFM) is a dedicated research lab for building, understanding, using, and risk-managing foundation models.
In the employer’s words · Read in context
Open 4 monthsWe first saw this posting 149 days ago and it is still up. Roles open this long are often slow to fill or kept open to collect applications.
These dates show when we found the posting. Check the employer’s website to confirm it is still accepting applications.
Higher than most similar jobs
$150K–$450K against $118K–$193K, the middle half of what similar US postings state.
From 3,721 postings in the last year. Stated ranges, not salaries paid.
Day 149
Up longer than most. Similar jobs usually come down between day 7 and day 56.
From 10,198 similar postings that came down. Coming down is not always a hire.
8 open jobs
Open jobs by the week we first saw them, last 12 weeks.
Add your resume and we’ll mark which of these tools you already use, and point out anything in the posting that could rule you out.
- 2+ years of experience with a clear emphasis on evaluations and/or training-data curation for ML systems (related areas: LLM training/fine-tuning, RL, or distributed ML systems). - Strong Python and PyTorch development experience. - Demonstrated experience designing and deep-diving into evaluations, or curating and generating training datasets — ideally both.
- Strong knowledge of the literature on agent evaluation, RL, LLM reasoning, and tool use. - Experience building or operating data pipelines and evaluation infrastructure reliable at scale (e.g., PyTorch, Ray). - Experience evaluating or generating data for software-engineering or computer-use agents.
Complete your application on jobs.lever.co. The employer’s form will show what is required.
Already applied? Track this application
New Data Scientist postings at the employers we follow are down 3% over the last 5 weeks compared with the 5 before.
Each bar is one week of new postings. The darkest bars are the last 5 weeks.
Counted from the hiring pages we’ve followed for at least five weeks, so employers we add don’t look like growth. Updated weekly.
We file this job under Data Scientist, by the work the posting describes.
Data scientists use statistics and models to answer harder questions, such as whether a change worked, what demand will look like next quarter, or which customers are likely to leave.
Postings usually ask for Python or R, SQL, statistics, experiment design and common machine learning methods.
Unlike an ML engineer, a data scientist's main output is often an analysis or a first model, not software running inside a product.
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics (May 2025) and Employment Projections (2025 to 2035). Occupation code 15-2051.
About the Institute of Foundation Models
The Institute of Foundation Models (IFM) is a dedicated research lab for building, understanding, using, and risk-managing foundation models. Our mandate is to advance research, nurture the next generation of AI builders, and drive transformative contributions to a knowledge-driven economy.
As part of our team, you'll work at the core of cutting-edge foundation model training, alongside world-class researchers, data scientists, and engineers, tackling the most fundamental and impactful challenges in AI development. You'll help build groundbreaking AI systems with the potential to reshape entire industries, and contribute to establishing MBZUAI as a global hub for high-performance computing and deep learning.
About the role
The Agents team trains advanced agentic language models that use reasoning and tool use to complete real tasks on a computer. This is a specialist role at the center of the loop that drives those models: the data we train on and the benchmarks we measure against.
You'll own the agentic data pipeline end-to-end — sourcing and generating high-quality trajectories, tool-use data, and RL environments — and the evaluation suite that tells us, rigorously and reproducibly, what our agents can actually do. These two halves are inseparable: benchmarks expose where models fail, and targeted data closes the gap. The agents are only as good as the data they learn from and the evals that keep us honest, and this role owns both.
This is a research scientist position for someone who wants depth in data and measurement rather than breadth across the whole stack. You should be the kind of person who reads through datasets line by line, distrusts a metric until it's been validated, and gets satisfaction from making an eval suite that nobody questions.
Benchmarking & evaluation
Design and run evaluations of agentic capabilities — multi-step reasoning, tool use, long-horizon planning, computer use, and safety properties — turning ambiguous notions of "intelligence" into defensible, reproducible metrics.
Build and harden evaluation harnesses so benchmarks run reliably at scale against training checkpoints, with clear signal on regressions and model health.
Run experiments characterizing how prompting, sampling, scaffolding, and environment design affect agentic performance on internal and public benchmarks.
Diagnose anomalous eval results mid-training-run — determine whether the cause is the model, the data, the harness, or the infrastructure — and communicate the answer clearly.
Agentic data
Source, generate, and curate high-quality agentic training data: trajectories, tool-use traces, and task datasets for new capabilities.
Design and scale RL environments and reward signals, and measure their impact on model performance.
Manage technical relationships with external data vendors and domain experts, evaluating data quality and iterating quickly on feedback.
Develop QA frameworks that catch reward hacking, label noise, and contamination, keeping data and benchmark quality high.
Across both
Contribute to technical reports, research publications, and open-source benchmarks and tooling.
Partner with research and product teams to translate capability goals into measurable data and evaluation artifacts.
Academic qualifications
BS, MS, or PhD (or equivalent experience) in Computer Science, Machine Learning, or a related field.
Minimum qualifications
2+ years of experience with a clear emphasis on evaluations and/or training-data curation for ML systems (related areas: LLM training/fine-tuning, RL, or distributed ML systems).
Strong Python and PyTorch development experience.
Demonstrated experience designing and deep-diving into evaluations, or curating and generating training datasets — ideally both.
Hands-on experience using LLM agents in your personal or professional work.
A habit of reading through raw data and trajectories to understand them and spot issues, and an instinct to distrust a metric until it's validated.
Preferred qualifications
Experience with reinforcement learning, reward design, or RL environment construction for LLMs.
Background in statistics and experimental design — a feel for signal-to-noise, statistical power, and contamination in evaluations.
Experience with large-scale dataset sourcing, curation, and processing, including working with external vendors or domain experts.
Strong knowledge of the literature on agent evaluation, RL, LLM reasoning, and tool use.
Experience building or operating data pipelines and evaluation infrastructure reliable at scale (e.g., PyTorch, Ray).
Experience evaluating or generating data for software-engineering or computer-use agents.
Contributions to published research, public benchmarks, and/or open-source ML software.
Stand up a new agentic benchmark from scratch — define the task, build the dataset and scoring, validate against known signals, and ship a view that makes the result legible to researchers and leadership.
Build an RL environment for a new high-value capability: design the reward, generate and QA the trajectory data, and measure the lift on model performance.
Diagnose a mid-training regression: an eval suite returns anomalous numbers and you determine whether it's the model, the harness, the data, or the infrastructure.
Partner with an external data vendor or domain expert to source high-quality trajectories, then build the QA framework that keeps reward hacking and contamination out.
Take a flaky distributed eval pipeline and make it reliable — better retries, better observability, faster feedback to researchers.
150,000 – 450,000 USD per year
Compensation
$150,000 – $450,000/year + discretionary performance bonus + benefits
The posted salary range represents the company’s good faith estimate of the base compensation for this position upon hire. The actual base compensation offered may vary within this range depending on individual qualifications, including but not limited to relevant skills, experience, education, certifications, and specific business needs. In addition to base salary, total compensation includes an annual discretionary performance bonus and comprehensive benefits.
Benefits Include
Full-time
Selected passages from the saved posting. Check the full description for conditions and exceptions.
Salary 150,000 – 450,000 USD per year Compensation
Compensation $150,000 – $450,000/year + discretionary performance bonus + benefits The posted salary range represents the company’s good faith estimate of the base compensation for this position upon hire. The actual base compensation offered may vary within this range depending on individual qualifications, including but not limited to relevant skills, experience, education, certifications, and specific business needs. In addition to base salary, total compensation includes an annual discretionary performance bonus and comprehensive benefits.
Sunnyvale, CA
Working pattern and location restrictions need checking in the full posting.
No clear work-authorization passage found. Eligibility is unconfirmed.